[Peninsula-Patriots] Fw: Legislative update - calls needed

 

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: John Taylor <tmgcoalition@aol.com>
To: l_edwards@verizon.net
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 8:27 AM
Subject: Legislative update - calls needed

 

Legislative Update 1-26-2012

 

**********************************************************

Call TODAY

 

OPPOSE

 

HB 321: "Income tax, state; educational improvement scholarships tax credits."

This bill, patroned by Del. Massie and brought to the House again this year, purports to bring school choice to Virginia.  However, Massie's bill does not provide real choice, but it would provide political cover for politicians while rising costs and falling public educational outcomes continue to plague all but the tiniest fraction of students, parents and taxpayers. As Dr. Adam Schaeffer of the Cato Institute says, a bad law is worse for school choice than nothing at all.

 

We OPPOSE this fatally flawed legislation.  Please contact your delegate TODAY and tell them that although you are in favor of School Choice, you oppose this bill and hope they will vote against it and will remove their name from the bill if they are currently a co-patron.

 

**********************************************************

 

WE SUPPORT THESE BILLS

 

1)  Eminent Domain Constitutional Amendment:

HJ 3 Constitutional amendment; taking or damaging of private property for public use (second reference).  Robert B. Bell | all patrons   Constitutional amendment (second resolution); taking or damaging of private property; public use.  Revises the prohibition on the enactment by the General Assembly of laws whereby private property may be taken or damaged. An existing provision authorizing the General Assembly to define what constitutes a public use is removed. The proposed amendment provides that private property can be taken or damaged only for a public use, only with just compensation to the owner, and only so much taken as is necessary for the public use. Just compensation must equal or exceed the value of the property taken, lost profits and lost access, and damages to the residue caused by the taking. A public service company, public service corporation, or railroad exercises the power of eminent domain for public use when such exercise is for the authorized provision of utility, common carrier, or railroad services. In all other cases, a taking or damaging of private property is not for public use if the primary use is for private gain, private benefit, private enterprise, increasing jobs, increasing tax revenue, or economic development, except for the elimination of a public nuisance existing on the property. The condemnor bears the burden of proving that the use is public, without a presumption that it is.

Status: (We support this bill)

01/12/12  House: Assigned P & E sub: Constitutional Amendments Subcommittee

 

The Constitutional Amendments Subcommittee of the House Privileges and Elections Committee meets on Mondays at 8:00a.m., 4^th Floor West Conference Room.  Monday's docket has not been posted, yet.

 

SJ 3 Constitutional amendment; taking or damaging of private property for public use (second reference).

 Mark D. Obenshain | all patrons 

 

Constitutional amendment (second resolution); taking or damaging of private property; public use.  Revises the prohibition on the enactment by the General Assembly of laws whereby private property may be taken or damaged. An existing provision authorizing the General Assembly to define what constitutes a public use is removed. The proposed amendment provides that private property can be taken or damaged only for a public use, only with just compensation to the owner, and only so much taken as is necessary for the public use. Just compensation must equal or exceed the value of the property taken, lost profits and lost access, and damages to the residue caused by the taking. A public service company, public service corporation, or railroad exercises the power of eminent domain for public use when such exercise is for the authorized provision of utility, common carrier, or railroad services. In all other cases, a taking or damaging of private property is not for public use if the primary use is for private gain, private benefit, private enterprise, increasing jobs, increasing tax revenue, or economic development, except for the elimination of a public nuisance existing on the property. The condemnor bears the burden of proving that the use is public, without a presumption that it is.

Status: (We support this bill)

11/21/11  Senate: Referred to Committee on Privileges and Elections

 

The Senate Privileges and Elections Committee meets on Tuesdays, 4:00 p.m., Senate Room A.  The docket for next Tuesday has not been posted, yet.

 

HB 5 Constitutional amendment; taking or damaging of private property for public use (voter referendum).

 Robert B. Bell | all patrons

 

Constitutional amendment (voter referendum); taking or damaging of private property; public use.  Provides for a referendum at the November 6, 2012, election to approve or reject an amendment eliminating the General Assembly's authority to define a public use for which private property may be taken or damaged and providing that no private property shall be taken or damaged for a public use without just compensation to the property owner and that only so much of the property as is necessary to achieve the public use is taken or damaged.

Status: (We support this bill)

01/12/12  House: Assigned P & E sub: Constitutional Amendments Subcommittee

 

The Constitutional Amendments Subcommittee of the House Privileges and Elections Committee meets on Mondays at 8:00a.m., 4^th Floor West Conference Room.  Monday's docket has not been posted, yet.

 

SB 240 Constitutional amendment; taking or damaging of private property for public use (voter referendum).

 Mark D. Obenshain | all patrons

 

Constitutional amendment (voter referendum); taking or damaging of private property; public use.  Provides for a referendum at the November 6, 2012, election to approve or reject an amendment eliminating the General Assembly's authority to define a public use for which private property may be taken or damaged and (i) requiring that eminent domain be exercised for public uses and not for the primary purpose of private gain, private benefit, private enterprise, increasing jobs, increasing tax revenue, or economic development; (ii) defining what is to be included in determining just compensation for permissible takings; and (iii) prohibiting the taking of more private property than is necessary for the stated public use.

Status: (We support this bill)

01/10/12  Senate: Referred to Committee on Privileges and Elections

 

The Senate Privileges and Elections Committee meets on Tuesdays, 4:00 p.m., Senate Room A.  The docket for next Tuesday has not been posted, yet.

 

2)  Currency:

HJ 118 Alternate medium of commerce or currency; joint subcommittee to study whether State should adopt.

 Robert G. Marshall | all patrons

 

Study;joint subcommittee to study alternative medium of commerce or currency; report. Establishes a joint subcommittee to study whether the Commonwealth should adopt an alternate medium of commerce or currency to serve as an alternative to the currency distributed by the Federal Reserve System in the event of a major breakdown of the Federal Reserve System.

 

Status: (We support this bill)

01/20/12  House: Assigned Rules sub: Studies

 

The Studies Subcommittee of the House Rules Committee meets on Thursdays, 4:00 p.m., 6^th Floor Speaker's Conference Room.  There is no posted docket for today.

 

 

WE OPPOSE THESE BILLS

 

 

1)  School Choice:

HB 321 Income tax, state; educational improvement scholarships tax credits.

 James P. "Jimmie" Massie, III | all patrons 

 

Income tax; educational improvement scholarships tax credits.  Establishes a credit beginning in taxable year 2012 for corporations donating cash or property to nonprofit organizations providing education improvement scholarships to students who would have been eligible for the free and reduced lunch program under federal law, in order for them to attend nonpublic elementary or secondary schools. Nonprofit organizations to which donations are made would be required to distribute at least 90 percent of their tax-credit-derived funds for such scholarships. The credit would equal 70 percent of the donation made by the corporation and would be refundable. Any corporation taking a charitable deduction on its federal income tax return would be required to add that amount back to its Virginia taxable income in order to receive the credit. There is a $25 million annual cap for the credits.

Status: (We oppose this bill)

01/10/12  House: Referred to Committee on Appropriations

01/16/12  House: Referred from Appropriations by voice vote

01/16/12  House: Referred to Committee on Finance

 

The House Finance Committee meets Mondays at 8:30 a.m. and Wednesdays, 1/2 hour after adjournment, House Room D.  The docket for Monday has not been posted, yet.

 

Please contact your delegate TODAY and tell them that although you are in favor of School Choice, you oppose this bill and hope they will vote against it and will remove their name from the bill if they are currently a co-patron.

 

To find your legislator, please follow this link:

http://conview.state.va.us/whosmy.nsf/main?openform

 

SB 241 Tax credits; businesses providing assistance to low-income families, etc., in private schools.

 Mark D. Obenshain | all patrons

 

Tax credits; assistance to low-income families, scholarships for K through 12 students attending private schools.  Establishes a credit beginning in taxable year 2012 for certain business entities making monetary donations to nonprofit organizations providing education improvement scholarships to students whose family's annual household income is not in excess of 300 percent of the current poverty guidelines and certain students with disabilities, in order for them to attend nonpublic elementary or secondary schools. Nonprofit organizations to which donations are made would be required to distribute at least 90 percent of their tax-credit-derived funds in the form of scholarships to such students. The credit would equal 84 percent of the donation made by the business entity and any unused credit for the taxable year would be refundable. There is an annual cap of $50 million in tax credits for the scholarship program. The Department of Education would administer the tax credit program.

 

The bill also expands the current Neighborhood Assistance Act Tax Credit program by increasing the tax credit percentage from 40 to 64 percent; expanding the eligibility criteria for programs qualifying for tax credits to encompass programs providing services to certain students with disabilities and individuals whose family's annual household income is not in excess of 300 percent of the poverty guidelines; and repealing the July 1, 2014, sunset for the program. Current law provides that programs qualifying for tax credits must provide services to individuals whose family's annual household income is not in excess of 200 percent of the current poverty guidelines.

Status: (We oppose this bill)

01/10/12  Senate: Referred to Committee on Finance

The Senate Finance Committee meets on Tuesdays and Wednesdays, 9:00 a.m., Senate Room B.  The dockets for next week have not been posted, yet.

 

SB 131 Income tax, corporate; educational improvement scholarships credit.

 William M. Stanley, Jr. | all patrons 

 

Income tax; educational improvement scholarships. Establishes a credit beginning in taxable year 2013 for corporations donating cash to nonprofit organizations providing education improvement scholarships to students who would have been eligible for the free and reduced-price lunch program under federal law, in order for them to attend nonpublic elementary or secondary schools. Nonprofit organizations to which donations are made would be required to distribute at least 90 percent of their annual receipts for such scholarships. The credit would equal 70 percent of the donation made by the corporation and would be refundable. Any corporation taking a charitable deduction on its federal income tax return would be required to add that amount back to its Virginia taxable income in order to receive this credit. There is a $25 million cap for the credits.

Status: (We oppose this bill)

01/10/12  Senate: Referred to Committee on Finance

The Senate Finance Committee meets on Tuesdays and Wednesdays, 9:00 a.m., Senate Room B.  The dockets for next week have not been posted, yet.

 

To find your legislator, please follow this link:

http://conview.state.va.us/whosmy.nsf/main?openform

 

            Please feel free to forward this message and future updates to your list.

 

 

John Taylor

President

Tertium Quids

282 Bald Rock Road

Verona, VA  24482

540-245-1776

JTaylor@TertiumQuids.org

 

 

 

 

--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list (Peninsula-Patriots-list@meetup.com)
This message was sent by DeWitt Edwards (l_edwards@verizon.net) from Peninsula Patriots.
To learn more about DeWitt Edwards, visit his/her member profile
To unsubscribe or to update your mailing list settings, click here

Meetup, PO Box 4668 #37895 New York, New York 10163-4668 | support@meetup.com