Wednesday, June 20, 2018

Convention of States Meeting this Saturday, June 23

TRACK

Wednesday, May 16, 2018

Re:

Hi there,
I reached out last week but haven't heard back so I wanted to try one last time. Is there an opportunity to sponsor a post on your site?
Please see my initial email below.
Best wishes,

Samuel
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:17 AM, Samuel jacobs <samueljacobs001@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi there,
I reached out last week but haven't heard back. I wanted to see if there was an opportunity to sponsor a post on your site.
Please see my initial email below.
Best wishes,
Samuel

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 7:37 AM, Samuel jacobs <samueljacobs001@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi there,

I just read Virginia@, I've shown it to some colleagues and we think a collaboration between us could work well.

I represent a digital marketing agency. We would like to feature a unique piece of content on your site on behalf of our client. For the privilege, we'd be happy to pay you somewhere in the region of $30.

Let me know your thoughts.

Best wishes,
Samuel




Don't want emails from us anymore? Reply to this email with the word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the subject line.



Don't want emails from us anymore? Reply to this email with the word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the subject line.



Don't want emails from us anymore? Reply to this email with the word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the subject line.

Thursday, May 3, 2018

The Hutto-Amended Anti-Abortion Bill...

Thoughts on the Hutto-Amended Dismemberment Bill... Can't see images? Click here...

Our thoughts on the Hutto-Amended Dismemberment Bill...

What happened in the SC Senate yesterday?

The Senate met late into the night and gave second reading to a significantly altered Dismemberment Bill. Ironically, the amendment was offered as a ploy by staunchly pro-abortion Democrat senator Brad Hutto. As the bill stands, it prohibits all abortions in the state except in cases of rape, incest, and life of the mother. If passed as it currently reads (the full text of the bill is below), the bill would end abortion on demand in South Carolina. The bill, as we understand it, is still amendable on third reading and will likely be filibustered by the same senator who put up the amendment that passed. Follow today's session here; it is scheduled to begin at 11:00 a.m.

Please keep in mind that this amended bill is not the Personhood Act of South Carolina. The Personhood Act offers a more thoughtful and foundational challenge to Roe vs. Wade and would not contain the unwelcome exceptions that are currently offered in the Hutto-Amended Dismemberment Bill. We still have work to do today and would urge you to contact your senators asking them to give the Personhood Act of South Carolina, S217, special order.

We are thankful to see the Lord at work in the hearts and minds of our senators in the past few days. We particularly commend the conscientious and thoughtful work of Senator Richard Cash, who argued eloquently for the protection of all preborn children in the womb. Though we see flaws in H3548, we do ask you to pray for its passage, if the Lord wills. This bill will not in any way halt the need for the Personhood Act. We must be mindful that all image-bearers have an unalienable right to life and deserve equal protection under the law without exceptions. That is the purpose of the Personhood Act, and we continue to urge its passage.

Finally, please join us tomorrow in fasting and praying on behalf of all the preborn babies of our state and nation.

Sincerely in Christ,
Personhood South Carolina Board of Directors
office@personhood.sc
864.384.8770

A BILL

TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, TO ENACT THE "SOUTH CAROLINA UNBORN CHILD PROTECTION FROM DISMEMBERMENT ABORTION ACT" BY ADDING ARTICLE 6 TO CHAPTER 41, TITLE 44 SO AS TO PROHIBIT DISMEMBERMENT ABORTIONS, WITH EXCEPTIONS, AND TO DEFINE RELEVANT TERMS; TO PROVIDE FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND CIVIL REMEDIES TO ENFORCE THE PROVISIONS OF THE ARTICLE; TO CREATE CRIMINAL PENALTIES; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

Amend Title To Conform

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:

SECTION    1.    Chapter 41, Title 44 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding:

"Article 6

South Carolina Unborn Child Protection from Abortion Act

Section 44-41-610.    This article may be cited as the South Carolina Unborn Child Protection from Abortion Act.

(A)    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, it is unlawful for a physician to knowingly perform or attempt to perform an abortion and thereby kill an unborn child unless necessary to prevent serious health risk to the unborn child's mother. 'Serious health risk to the unborn child's mother' means that in reasonable medical judgment she has a condition that so complicates her medical condition that it necessitates the abortion of her pregnancy to avert her death or to avert serious risk of substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function, not including psychological or emotional conditions. No such condition may be determined to exist if it is based on a claim or diagnosis that the woman will engage in conduct which she intends to result in her death or in substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function.

(B)    As used in this section:

(1)    'Abortion' means the intention of causing the death of an unborn child.

(2)    The term 'physician' means a physician, surgeon, or osteopath authorized to practice medicine in this State and licensed pursuant to Chapter 47, Title 40. However, an individual who is not a physician, but who directly and knowingly performs an abortion is also subject to the provisions of this section.

(C)    This article prohibits abortion for any reason excluding rape, and incest and the life of the mother.

Section 44-41-620.    Nothing in this article shall be construed as creating or recognizing a right to abortion, nor a right to a particular method of abortion."

SECTION    2.    If any section, subsection, paragraph, subparagraph, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this act is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such holding shall not affect the constitutionality or validity of the remaining portions of this act, the General Assembly hereby declaring that it would have passed this act and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, subparagraph, sentence, clause, phrase, and word thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, subsections, paragraphs, subparagraphs, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words hereof may be declared to be unconstitutional, invalid, or otherwise ineffective.

SECTION    3.    This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor.

Facebook Twitter

Personhood South Carolina

www.personhood.sc

PO Box 1414

Gaffney, SC 29342

SHARE TWEET FORWARD

You received this email because you signed up for Personhood SC's newsletter or prayer reminders.

Unsubscribe

Sunday, April 29, 2018

Tea Party Reunion Monday, May 14 @ 6 PM in Middlesex ~ Join Us!

 



Middle Peninsula Tea Partiers, Conservatives, Republicans & supporters ~ 

What better day to consider how best to thwart the dark forces that threaten America?

 Come REUNITE with other 'Right-Thinking' patriots to 

  ➢ Rekindle old acquaintances

➢ Join together for a simple meal

➢ Hear from our former Tea Party leaders and others

➢ Get inspired and energized to help 'Make the Miracle!'


Who: All Lovers of Liberty! (Patriots, friends, family, neighbors!)

WhenMonday, May 14, 6 - 8 PM

Where: Middlesex Shooting Sports Club (1860 Twiggs Ferry Rd, Hartfield, VA 23071)

        * FREE * * FREE * * FREE * * FREE * * FREE * 

 *We NEED to know how many are coming so PLEASE 'reply' to this message with the approximate number of those coming by May 6 if possible.


Thank you! Looking forward to seeing everyone! (AND please pass this along to interested friends who may have been overlooked!) 

Sue Sherrill (+Tom Robinson, Dorothy Bayford, Ruth Litchewski & others!)
804-815-9329










Friday, April 27, 2018

Kirk Cox Speaks Out Against Megasite

 
 
Bermuda Advocates for Responsible Development
 
 
Kirk Cox Speaks Out Against Megasite
 
Bermuda Advocates for Responsible Development
 
Here is the email Kirk Cox sent on April 27, 2018 to his constituent mailing list. You can thank him at kirk@kirkcox.com


Dear Friend,

As your Delegate, I represent your voice in the General Assembly on issues that affect the state. In addition to being your Delegate, I'm also your neighbor in Colonial Heights and a former teacher at Manchester High School in Chesterfield County. My duty lies in state public service, but my family and home are rooted in Colonial Heights and Chesterfield, and I have always said that I would do what I thought was best for this community.

I hear often about local issues that affect our everyday lives. Lately, people have expressed to me strong concerns over the proposed Matoaca Mega Site.

In September, following the announcement of the mega site project, I sent a letter to the Chesterfield Board of Supervisors requesting they hold additional public meetings to ensure that nearby residents and community groups had ample opportunity to learn, ask questions, and provide feedback to their elected officials. I have always emphasized the importance of transparency, community engagement, and keeping the public fully informed. It is imperative that citizens have the opportunity to ask questions and share their thoughts on issues that affect their neighborhood.

While I believe industrial site development in general is merited, it is clear the Chesterfield location does not have the community support necessary for such a significant project to succeed. I hear from constituents regularly who have not been satisfied with the handling of this project and do not approve of building a mega site in Chesterfield.

Given the lack of community support for the Matoaca Mega Site, I cannot support the continued progress of this project. I have shared this news with Chesterfield County officials, encouraging them to consider a different approach.

As the Chesterfield County Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors have the final approval of the zoning, I hope they will take into consideration the concerns of the community  above all else.
Sincerely,




Kirk Cox
 
 
 
 
Bermuda Advocates for Responsible Development Mailing Address:
4807 W Hundred Rd
Chester, VA 23831
 
 
POWERED BY MUSTER
 
TERMS | PRIVACY
 
Opt Out